SC grants bail to an ailing accused, but his freedom remains elusive, because one Judge could not sign the orderBy:june 21, 2016In a bizarre case, the Supreme Court’s vacation bench comprising Justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and L Nageswara Rao, had on 17 June granted bail to an accused under custody in Jharkhand since 9 November last year, but could not ensure his freedom till the court’s reopening on 29 June. The accused, Pushpendra Kumar Sinha, is reportedly suffering from several ailments.The Court’s vacation bench comprising Justices Shiva Kirti Singh and AM Khanwilkar, today pleaded its helplessness to the counsel of the accused, Pranav Sachdeva, because one of the Judges on the bench which granted the bail, could not sign the order,before he left Delhi.Sources toldLiveLawthat while Justice Goel signed the order granting bail, Justice Rao could not, before he left Delhi.Today, as Sachdeva mentioned the matter before the Vacation bench, Justice Shiva Kirti Singh told the counsel:“We can’t help; we can’t sign. We are sorry. All our sympathies are with you. Unfortunately, you have to wait till the vacation is over.”When the bench asked what the Supreme Court rules say, it was told that both the Judges must sign.When the counsel asked whether he could mention it again tomorrow, the bench pleaded its helplessness in the matter.
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking the “Agree” button and accessing this website (www.inslawnetwork.com) the user fully accepts that you are seeking information of your own accord and volition and that no form of solicitation has taken place by the Firm or its members.
The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for information purposes only. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. The firm is not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material / information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.